A judge just ruled that a lawsuit filed by Jewish students against Harvard University will proceed to the discovery phase. The case claims that Harvard has been lacking in its response to cases of antisemitism on campus.
Judge Rules on Lawsuit
A federal judge just ruled that a lawsuit against Harvard University over claims of failing to properly address antisemitism on campus will proceed. The case will move to discovery.
Antisemitism Suit Against Harvard
The lawsuit was filed by six Jewish students claiming that during several antisemitic incidents, Harvard did not properly respond. The plaintiffs are claiming that the action taken by Harvard was inadequate and discriminatory.
Plaintiffs in the Case
Most of the plaintiffs have opted to be anonymous in the case, as they are concerned about potential retaliation. However, one plaintiff, Alexander “Shabbos” Kestenbaum, a recent graduate of Harvard Divinity School, has tied his name to the case.
Judge’s Ruling
U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns denied Harvard’s motion to dismiss the case, claiming that it’s possible the university’s response was insufficient.
Breach of Contract
The judge mentioned that Harvard’s response could mean a breach of contract under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination among places receiving federal financial assistance.
Examples of Antisemitic Behavior
The examples provided by the plaintiffs of antisemitic behavior include harassment, intimidation, and exclusion based on their Jewish identity and open support for Israel.
Harvard’s Defense
Harvard’s defense is that it took significant steps to address antisemitism. The university created a task force and issued statements openly condemning antisemitic acts. The plaintiffs are arguing that it wasn’t enough.
Discovery Phase
The next phase of the lawsuit will be the discovery phase, where Harvard will have to provide detailed documentation about its efforts to stop antisemitism. This could take anywhere from a few months to a few years.
Statements From Lawyers
The plaintiff’s lawyer, Marc E. Kasowitz, has stated that he will be thoroughly investigating Harvard’s files and communications. He wants to fully expose the university’s shortcomings.
Harvard’s Response
Harvard spokesperson Jason A. Newton is confident that once all of the facts are revealed, the university’s actions will be justified. He emphasized that Harvard is committed to supporting its Jewish students.
Jewish Students
The plaintiffs of this case have described Harvard’s campus as hostile. They claim that Jewish students are treated as second-class citizens and cannot fully express their identity and views.
The Broader Context
This case is part of a growing trend of universities facing backlash for how they handle discrimination and harassment complaints. This outcome of this case could influence other similar situations in the future.
Comparison to MIT Case
Judge Stearns just recently dismissed a similar lawsuit against MIT, ruling that the university responded appropriately to antisemitism on campus. This ruling makes it especially clear that the Judge was not confident in Harvard’s responses.
Role of Title VI
The use of Title VI as a primary violation discussion in this case is significant. This part could have implications for other universities as these discussions remain prevalent.
Claims of Islamophobia
Harvard has faced criticism for cases of Islamophobia as well. Many pro-Palestinian Harvard students claimed that Harvard also failed to protect them from harassment, assault, and threats.
Jewish Students Sue Other Universities
This is also not the first time that Jewish students have banded together to sue a university over claims of discrimination. Jewish students have also sued NYU, Columbia University, and UCLA over their handling of pro-Palestinian protests.
Harvard’s Task Force
Harvard established a task force that was meant to handle discrimination-related cases. The force has made recommendations, but the plaintiffs in this case are arguing that the suggestions have not been properly implemented.
Condemning Hate
Harvard has also issued many statements openly condemning antisemitism and hate speech in a show of support. These statements will be a large part of the university’s defense.
Past Discipline
Harvard is also claiming that it has taken disciplinary action against many students and staff in cases of antisemitism. Once again, these Jewish students aren’t satisfied.
Setting a Precedent
Future cases of handling antisemitism in educational settings are likely to be influenced by this case. It shows us how important it is to address these problems head-on rather than reactively.
Future Cases of Antisemitism
As the case proceeds and the university’s actions are brought to light, the culture around these kinds of situations is likely to change. Future universities may take inspiration from this case when addressing their own Title VI claims.
21 Beliefs About the Bible That Are Actually False
The Bible is one of the most discussed and debated books in history, yet many common beliefs about it are more myth than fact. How many of these misconceptions have you heard before? 21 Beliefs About the Bible That Are Actually False
21 Subtle Racisms That Are Commonplace in America
Racism in America isn’t always overt; it often hides in plain sight through subtle actions and attitudes. How many of these subtle racisms have you noticed around you? 21 Subtle Racisms That Are Commonplace in America
Only Legal in America: 21 Things You CAN’T Do in the Rest of the World
The U.S. dances to its own beat, especially when it comes to laws that make the rest of the world do a double-take. Here’s a lineup of things that scream “Only in America,” sticking strictly to what’s written in the law books. Ready for a tour through the American legal landscape that’ll leave you wondering if freedom might just be a bit too free? Only Legal in America: 21 Things You CAN’T Do in the Rest of the World
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / AevanStock.
