protest, lgbt

Louisiana LGBTQ Purge Backfires as Library Board Members Sue Parish Council

Three former St. Tammany Library Board of Control members, Bill McHugh, Anthony Parr, and Rebecca Taylor, have filed a federal lawsuit against the St. Tammany Parish Council after they were removed for trying to protect LGBTQ+ books.

Book Ban Controversy

Image Credit: Shutterstock / On The Run Photo

The lawsuit follows a year-long effort by the far-right St. Tammany Library Accountability Project to remove โ€œsexually explicitโ€ books, but they are primarily targeting LGBTQ+ themed books.

Removal of Board Members

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Redaktion93

On May 4, the conservative-dominated parish council voted to replace five of the six library board members for non-compliance with their new agenda of banning books.

First Amendment Violation

Image Credit: Shutterstock / zimmytws

The former council memberโ€™s lawsuit claims that removing the board members was retaliatory and violated their First Amendment rights to speak out and resist the book bans.

Constitutionally Protect Activities

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff

In their defense, their lawyers claimed that โ€œPlaintiffs were engaged in constitutionally protected activity when they spoke and acted at Library Bord [sic] meetings.โ€

Request for Temporary Restraining Order

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Andrii Zastrozhnov

The former council members are seeking a temporary restraining order to continue serving on the library board while the case proceeds and to block the councilโ€™s resolution to remove them permanently.

Book Content Battle

Image Credit: Shutterstock / nito

The lawsuit comes after a prolonged internal fight over appropriate library book content, where the St. Tammany Library Accountability Project attempted to ban over 150 books that mostly contained LGBTQ+ themes.

Months of Conflict

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Studio Specialty

Once the board members were removed, it culminated in months of contentious fights between the library board and conservative activists within the parish.

Contentious Vote

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Sergey Tinyakov

The parish council voted to replace five board members and highlighted the need for staggered terms under state law, but the plaintiffs argue this was a pretext for their removal.

An Obvious Plow

Image Credit: Shutterstock / aerogondo2

The defense said, โ€œThe concern over staggered terms was an โ€˜obvious ployโ€™ used to retaliate against their protected speech.โ€

Legal Basis

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff

The plaintiffs argue that their removal violates Supreme Court precedents protecting citizensโ€™ rights to discussion, debate, and information.

The Spirit of the First Amendment

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff

The defense continued, โ€œThe State may not, consistently with the spirit of the First Amendment, contract the spectrum of available knowledge.โ€

Publicโ€™s Right to Information

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Zoran Zeremski

The lawsuit also claims that allowing the removed board members to continue working in the library would protect the publicโ€™s constitutional rights to receive information by maintaining access to the banned library books.

The Publicโ€™s Constitutional Rights

Image Credit: Shutterstock / KOTOIMAGES

The plaintiffs argued, โ€œAllowing the members to continue serving would continue to protect the publicโ€™s constitutional rights to receive information by maintaining their access to library books.โ€

Preserving Board Integrity

Image Credit: Shutterstock / bodnar.photo

From these excerpts, itโ€™s clear that the plaintiffโ€™s case hinges on the idea that preventing the parish council from engaging in unlawful dismissal will preserve the integrity and independence of the Library Board.

The Larger Debate

Image Credit: Shutterstock / RR AUDIOVISUAL

While the case may seem strong when reading their points, this debate surrounding the publicโ€™s access to LGBTQ+ books is part of a much larger nationwide conversation.

Negatively Impacting Youth

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Valeria Valeria

Unfortunately these types of debates are happening all across the United States, with new legislation that has been shown to negatively impact the mental health of LGBTQ+ students by creating an atmosphere of silence and exclusion.

Louisianaโ€™s Bill

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Yuriy Golub

The most recent โ€œDonโ€™t Say Gayโ€ bill passed came from Louisiana State Senators, who passed House Bill 122, which will effectively ban discussions of LGBTQ+ issues in schools. 

Stopping Heterosexual Discussions

Image Credit: Shutterstock / LStockStudio

According to state Rep. Dodie Horton, the bill also prevents discussions of heterosexuality and cisgender identity to avoid any sexualized personal discussions in classrooms.

Inappropriate Discussions

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Niyazz

When supporting the bill, Horton said, โ€œHaving sexualized personal discussions between educators and students in our classrooms are not appropriate.โ€

The post Louisiana LGBTQ Purge Backfires as Library Board Members Sue Parish Council first appeared on Pulse of Pride.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Kamila Koziol.

+ posts

Get Our Most Read Post on Black History

Sign up now and get daily emails of the lastest posts on Pulse of Pride and get a download of our most popular post:

โ€‹
โ€‹20 Disturbing Truths Why Americans Turn Their Backs on Black History

    We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.